Looking for practice material?
Find thousands of archived packets FREE for practice and study use at the Quizbowl Packet Archive!
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jan 23, 2018 9:37 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Help with a new conference 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010
Posts: 261
Post Help with a new conference
Our conference is going to expand to 10 teams next season. Currently, we play weekly games until each team has faced every team, then there is a Saturday tournament. Including that conference tournament, 10 of our 14 matches would be consumed by our conference, leaving little room for tournaments.

Our football team is splitting the Conference into a north vs. south division, but they don't have the flexibility that QB does, in that they can't play 5 games in one day. I'd also like to avoid splitting since some good rivalries are bound to fizzle out.

Basically, what can you tell me about weekend round-robins? What are the pros and cons? How do we set them up? I'd like to be able to propose something to my conference sometime in the next couple of weeks.

Thanks!


Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:09 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006
Posts: 4134
Location: Columbia, MO
Post Re: Help with a new conference
I strongly recommend running your conference as some kind of weekend only tournament. Unfortunately, if you were to use the MSHSAA format that would probably force you to run the tournament over at least two weekends. However, if you are in some kind of leadership role, I think a good solution would be to use an NAQT A-set then run a 10 game round robin on that. A-sets run on 20/20 rounds, have 3 line tossups that are ideally easier than standard pyramidal writing, and should allow you to very easily fit 9 games in before 3 PM, not counting a final. If for whatever reason that is not a possibility, I would then recommend figuring out a way to run a tournament where teams play 5 games one Saturday then four the next. Given MSHSAA's unenlightened stance on the fact that a match within a tournament can also bafflingly count as a tournament, I think something like this would do a lot to free up the calendar in your conference. Having never been to a school with conference duals, it seems to an outsider that they don't offer a lot of advantages compared to just playing a calendar full of Saturday tournaments.


Mon Mar 01, 2010 10:12 am
Profile

Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010
Posts: 1
Post Re: Help with a new conference
I don't think that weekends only will work. As we are all small schools and have students involved in multiple activites, going to a weekend format would eliminate a lot of players. I also don't like the NAQT format that we have seen in several tournaments this year.

I know 10 out of 14 takes up some tournament time, but is there any way that we could do some type of round robin and stay on Thursday nights?


Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:54 am
Profile

Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009
Posts: 1609
Post Re: Help with a new conference
Keep in mind that using questions from NAQT does not necessarily using their game format. S&T's spring tournament, for one, used NAQT questions in a modified Missouri-format. Regardless of opinions about game format, I think we can all agree that NAQT's questions are preferable to QG's.


Tue Mar 16, 2010 10:43 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004
Posts: 4357
Location: Ozark, Missouri
Post Re: Help with a new conference
Probably the most elegant way to stay on weeknights and still play nine other teams exactly once each is to use the "quad" format and play three games a night on three nights. Keeping the Saturday tournament in the mix, this takes your number of used dates down from ten to four, which seems a reasonable compromise. This also gives you some flexibility on travel, as you can pick a central location to host each of the quad meets (or just rotate hosts, or whatever).

As Jason alluded to, buying questions from NAQT does not necessitate using that format (although a full round-robin on a Saturday among ten teams in that format would work perfectly). Our spring tournament at Missouri S&T used a hybrid Missouri/NAQT format: NAQT questions converted into four-quarter rounds of 32 tossups and 16 bonuses, which seemed to be well-received. I suppose I would have to hear what exactly the objection is to the NAQT format to have a better idea of what alternative format to suggest.


Tue Mar 16, 2010 1:14 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Forum style by STSoftware for PTF.
Translated by MaĆ«l Soucaze © 2010 phpBB.fr